Comment ENG

Developer Claude Code Toolkit

GitHub · Sentry · Linear · Slack · Supabase. Pre-configured for engineering teams where senior devs also manage the product.

97%reduction in time critical vulnerabilities remain open — Cogent, after deploying Claude for security workflows
25–50%productivity gains across DevSecOps workflows — GitLab, across 100K+ engineers
20 seatsClawHacks Delhi NCR — Developer Toolkit install + live MCP server build in one day

Startup engineering teams where senior engineers are also managing the product.

The same week a senior engineer reviews PRs, handles incidents, manages sprint planning, onboards a new hire, and ships a feature. Each context switch costs 20 minutes. A configured Claude Code setup eliminates most of the switching — GitHub, Sentry, Linear, and Slack are in one session.

The next Delhi NCR ClawHacks session is a Developer Toolkit install combined with a live MCP server build — in one room, in one day. You leave with a working setup and a connector to an API of your choice.

"97% reduction in time critical vulnerabilities remain open after deploying Claude for security and code review workflows."

Cogent — after deploying Claude for security workflows

One session. Everything you need.

Connected to GitHub, Sentry, Linear, Slack, and Supabase — the stack most startup engineering teams run on.

/pr-review [pr-url]High impact

Logic errors, security issues, style violations — categorised by type, severity, and fix complexity. Pulls directly from GitHub.

/incident-brief [issue]High impact

P0/P1 summary from Sentry data. Impact, root cause, timeline, fix, follow-up. Structured brief in under 2 minutes.

/debug [error]High impact

Structured debugging with Sentry + GitHub context. What went wrong and where to look — cross-file, not just the error line.

/sprint-kickoff [sprint]Medium impact

Prioritised sprint plan from Linear or Jira tickets. Fibonacci sizing. MoSCoW prioritisation. Ready before the standup.

/onboard [new-hire]Medium impact

Setup document from codebase and project context. Architecture, stack, key files, first-week priorities.

/refactor [file]Medium impact

Complexity analysis, dead code identification, and refactor plan for a specified file or module.

Before you configure anything — test these.

Paste code or PR links directly. These work in regular Claude.ai right now.

PR Security ReviewReview this pull request for security vulnerabilities. Check for: SQL injection, authentication bypass, privilege escalation, cross-site scripting, insecure direct object references, and logic errors that could be exploited. For each finding: describe the vulnerability, the exploit path, and the fix. Flag by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low).

Pair with GitHub connector for direct PR access. /pr-review handles this for any PR URL with one command.

Incident BriefWe have a P[0/1] incident: [error description]. Here's the Sentry data: [paste]. Here's the recent deployment history: [paste]. Build an incident brief: impact (who is affected, how many, what they can't do), likely root cause, immediate mitigation steps, timeline of what happened, and follow-up actions with owners.

With Sentry + GitHub connected, /incident-brief pulls this data automatically and has a structured brief ready in 2 minutes.

Sprint KickoffHere are our Linear tickets for this sprint: [paste or list]. Prioritise them using MoSCoW method. For each Must-Have: estimate in Fibonacci points and explain the sizing. Flag any dependencies, blocked tickets, or tickets that need more spec before they can be worked. Format: prioritised list with sizing and flags.

/sprint-kickoff pulls directly from Linear or Jira with the connector. The kickoff doc is ready before the standup.

Your Product's MCP ConnectorWe're evaluating whether to build a Claude MCP connector for [our product]. Our API: [describe what endpoints exist]. Our users: [who they are, what they do]. List the 8 most valuable actions Claude could take with our product. For each: the specific action, required API endpoints, expected user outcome, and whether it's read-only or write. Also flag any actions that would be rejected by Anthropic's review criteria.

This is the first step in building a connector. The tool definition list is what Anthropic's reviewers evaluate. Get it right before writing any code.

If your product has an API and enterprise users — a Claude connector is the next distribution channel.

Products on Claude's directory get surfaced when users ask for tool recommendations in your category. The directory is 6 months old. Less than 5 Indian SaaS products listed out of 200+. Most engineering tool categories are still open for a first listing.

Send this to your CTO / founder if your product isn't listed yet
Hey [Name],

Quick one: claude.com/connectors — search our category.

[Category status: crowded / sparse / near-empty]

Products listed get surfaced when enterprise users ask Claude for
tool recommendations. Our category might still be open for first-mover.

I know the team that builds these (1–4 weeks): architeqt.ai

Worth a 15-minute call?
Rishi Bajpai — Architeqt AI
The setup that changes the week

30 minutes to configure. Results visible in week one.

Get the toolkit + ClawHacks invite

Repo access and the next date.

I'll send the repo link and add you to the ClawHacks list for the next Delhi NCR session.

Want to see /pr-review on your actual codebase?

15 minutes. I'll connect to your GitHub repo and run a PR review live so you can see exactly what the output looks like before you decide anything.

Book a free callcal.com/buildwithrishi/architeqt