GitHub · Sentry · Linear · Slack · Supabase. Pre-configured for engineering teams where senior devs also manage the product.
The same week a senior engineer reviews PRs, handles incidents, manages sprint planning, onboards a new hire, and ships a feature. Each context switch costs 20 minutes. A configured Claude Code setup eliminates most of the switching — GitHub, Sentry, Linear, and Slack are in one session.
The next Delhi NCR ClawHacks session is a Developer Toolkit install combined with a live MCP server build — in one room, in one day. You leave with a working setup and a connector to an API of your choice.
"97% reduction in time critical vulnerabilities remain open after deploying Claude for security and code review workflows."
Cogent — after deploying Claude for security workflowsConnected to GitHub, Sentry, Linear, Slack, and Supabase — the stack most startup engineering teams run on.
Logic errors, security issues, style violations — categorised by type, severity, and fix complexity. Pulls directly from GitHub.
P0/P1 summary from Sentry data. Impact, root cause, timeline, fix, follow-up. Structured brief in under 2 minutes.
Structured debugging with Sentry + GitHub context. What went wrong and where to look — cross-file, not just the error line.
Prioritised sprint plan from Linear or Jira tickets. Fibonacci sizing. MoSCoW prioritisation. Ready before the standup.
Setup document from codebase and project context. Architecture, stack, key files, first-week priorities.
Complexity analysis, dead code identification, and refactor plan for a specified file or module.
Paste code or PR links directly. These work in regular Claude.ai right now.
Review this pull request for security vulnerabilities. Check for: SQL injection, authentication bypass, privilege escalation, cross-site scripting, insecure direct object references, and logic errors that could be exploited. For each finding: describe the vulnerability, the exploit path, and the fix. Flag by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low).Pair with GitHub connector for direct PR access. /pr-review handles this for any PR URL with one command.
We have a P[0/1] incident: [error description]. Here's the Sentry data: [paste]. Here's the recent deployment history: [paste]. Build an incident brief: impact (who is affected, how many, what they can't do), likely root cause, immediate mitigation steps, timeline of what happened, and follow-up actions with owners.With Sentry + GitHub connected, /incident-brief pulls this data automatically and has a structured brief ready in 2 minutes.
Here are our Linear tickets for this sprint: [paste or list]. Prioritise them using MoSCoW method. For each Must-Have: estimate in Fibonacci points and explain the sizing. Flag any dependencies, blocked tickets, or tickets that need more spec before they can be worked. Format: prioritised list with sizing and flags./sprint-kickoff pulls directly from Linear or Jira with the connector. The kickoff doc is ready before the standup.
We're evaluating whether to build a Claude MCP connector for [our product]. Our API: [describe what endpoints exist]. Our users: [who they are, what they do]. List the 8 most valuable actions Claude could take with our product. For each: the specific action, required API endpoints, expected user outcome, and whether it's read-only or write. Also flag any actions that would be rejected by Anthropic's review criteria.This is the first step in building a connector. The tool definition list is what Anthropic's reviewers evaluate. Get it right before writing any code.
Products on Claude's directory get surfaced when users ask for tool recommendations in your category. The directory is 6 months old. Less than 5 Indian SaaS products listed out of 200+. Most engineering tool categories are still open for a first listing.
Hey [Name], Quick one: claude.com/connectors — search our category. [Category status: crowded / sparse / near-empty] Products listed get surfaced when enterprise users ask Claude for tool recommendations. Our category might still be open for first-mover. I know the team that builds these (1–4 weeks): architeqt.ai Worth a 15-minute call?

30 minutes to configure. Results visible in week one.
I'll send the repo link and add you to the ClawHacks list for the next Delhi NCR session.
15 minutes. I'll connect to your GitHub repo and run a PR review live so you can see exactly what the output looks like before you decide anything.